Wednesday, September 20, 2006

FBI Stats Show New York Safest City In 2005; Statewide Violent Crime Up A Little

From KWTX ("New York Safest; Dallas Most Dangerous," September 19, 2006):

FBI statistics show Dallas had the highest crime rate of any of the nation's top largest cities last year.

The FBI Uniform Crime Report found about one crime was reported in Dallas last year for every 12 people.

New York remained the safest of the nation's ten largest cities in 2005, with about one crime reported for every 37 people.

San Jose was the second safest, followed by Los Angeles, San Diego, Chicago, Philadelphia, Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix and Dallas.

The national figures showed that violent crime rose 2.3 percent last year, the first increase since 2001.

And the ten largest cities in order of safety from the above link:

  1. New York: one crime per 37.38 residents.
  2. San Jose, Calif.: one crime per 34.46 residents.
  3. Los Angeles: one crime per 25.97 residents.
  4. San Diego: one crime per 24.09 residents.
  5. Chicago: one crime per 21.9 residents.
  6. Philadelphia: one crime per 17.96 residents.
  7. Houston: one crime per 14.17 residents.
  8. San Antonio: one crime per 14.12 residents.
  9. Phoenix: one crime per 14.10 residents.
  10. Dallas: one crime per 11.79 residents.

On a bad note, violent crime around the state increased a little this past year. However, overall, the state crime rate is down a bit too ("New York State crime rate down," September 18, 2006):

The state's overall crime rate has dropped once again, although there was a slight increase in violent crimes. According to the 2005 FBI report, violent crime was up a little more than one percent last year.

That reflects similar numbers for the rest of the country. Officials from Governor Pataki's office say an increase in gun crimes led to the bump in the overall violent-crime rate.

But the governor says he's already boosted money for gun violence prevention by $16 million for this year.

The crime ratea for 2005 was up a little nationally. Information from the FBI:

FOX23 in Albany: "Canal Businesses Took Hit from June Flooding"

Flooding damaged Erie Canal boating business this summer. From the AP via Fox News ("Canal Businesses Took Hit from June Flooding," loaded Sept. 19, 2006):
(Utica, N.Y.) AP -- Too much water wasn't a good thing this year for the New York state canal system.

The severe flooding that hit parts of upstate New York in late June closed sections of the Erie Canal for two weeks at the height of the summer boating season. That put a dent in the bottom line for many of the canalside businesses that rely on boaters for much of their summertime trade.

According to state officials, the canal locks handled 80,000 boat passages from late April through early August last year. During the same period this year, that number was about 57,000.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Waterway commuting

An old saying goes that every great city has its river. This may be true, but many aren't using them very much anymore, as cities concentrate more on tertiery services and less on shipping and industry. Jennifer Saranow of The Wall Street Journal wrote an article ("Cities encourage commuters to take to the water," September 5, 2006) about the expansion of commuting services by waterways, which has gotten some attention from the federal government.

According to the article, "At the federal level, the latest transportation bill authorized more funding for ferries than the previous bill - $335 million over five years, up from $220 million in the previous bill."

The New York metropolitan area has seen the following:
Besides the new water-transportation options, existing services in cities from New York to Seattle are expanding and trying to spur ridership. Earlier this year, the privately owned New York Water Taxi, which serves commuters crossing the East River with yellow taxilike boats, started forming partnerships with new apartment developments and giving new tenants discounts and free passes. Another private ferry operator NY Waterway, with 18 local routes, painted two of its ferries last month to resemble yachts and plans to put the finish on all 34 ships it operates. In August, Washington State Ferries started testing letting riders buy tickets online and is working on enabling monthly pass holders to get fees automatically downloaded to pass cards each month.

...

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey estimates that there are about 37,000 daily weekday trips across 22 routes in the area, up from about 33,000 trips daily on 14 routes before the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. The agency, which has started working on a study that could lead to a regional ferry plan, predicts growth of 3 percent to 5 percent over the next few years, with ferry service set to be launched between Yonkers, N.Y., and Manhattan in the spring and from Edgewater, N.J., to lower Manhattan later this year.

...

NJ Transit in New Jersey has also over the past year adjusted some of its commuter-bus routes so they link up better to ferries going to New York.

...

Ferries also can serve as an important form of backup transportation, for instance, during blackouts or after terrorist attacks. After Sept. 11, 2001, large numbers of people were evacuated from lower Manhattan in boats and extra ferry service in the area until late 2003 helped to make up for shuttered commuter-train service.


The drawbacks? Ferries generally depend on gasoline, which is getting expensive. "[O]n June 1, NY Waterway raised some prices 25 cents to $1 per ride depending on the route," Saranow wrote. "A one-way ticket from Weehawken, N.J., to midtown Manhattan, for instance, went up 25 cents to $6 and a monthly pass went up to $211 from $200. In contrast, to get from Weehawken to Manhattan by rail would cost about $3.25 per ride and about $93 a month, but would include a train transfer in Hoboken, according to NJ Transit. The monthly NY Waterway fare from Belford, N.J., rose to $572 from $550. To get a train from the area to Manhattan costs $297 per month.

AMD Coming to Albany

Advanced Micro Devices is opening a plant in New York's Capital Region. According to Times-Union interviews with locals in Austin, Texas, where the bulk of AMD's operations are, it's been a good corporate citizen ("A city without limits for AMD," Rulison, Larry; Albany Times-Union, September 17, 2006):
Although some in Austin have been upset by the construction of AMD's new campus -- the 59-acre site is located atop a sensitive aquifer -- others are happy the company is investing money in the city and solidifying its operations here. They praise AMD for its economic impact and support of the city's cultural and social welfare institutions.

Locals say New York's Capital Region should expect similar corporate involvement when AMD ultimately decides to build a chip fab here.

"You are very fortunate that AMD is coming to Albany," said Brewster McCracken, an Austin City Council member who says AMD is the city's largest user of renewable energy and one of the largest supporters of local nonprofits. "They're going to be a major contributor to your community."

New York Sun: "Realign Amtrak"

The New York Sun, a conservative city-based paper, published an op-ed making the case for privatizing Amtrak ("Realign, Amtrak," Joseph Vranich, September 15, 2006):
Today the Senate will vote on whether to give Amtrak a record $1.6 billion in subsidies for next year and still more for a loan bailout. This is wrong. It's past time for someone in Congress to apply the brakes to the run-away Amtrak train

The bill at issue, promoted by Senators Lott, Clinton, and Schumer, aims to reform Amtrak. But it is only a pretend reform. One problem is that it prohibits competition against Amtrak's monopoly by private contractors who have taken over and improved trains in Europe, Australia and South America and won contests against Amtrak to run commuter trains in Boston, Los Angeles and San Diego. The bill allows domestic freight railroads to bid on any one Amtrak route in 2008, but freight lines like Union Pacific and CSX have made it clear they have no interest in doing so. Hence, the Senate bill thumbs its nose at innovative solutions that 56 nations have applied to their Amtrak-like problems.

A transportation expert at the Heritage Foundation, Ron Utt, hits the nail on the head when he notes that the proposals taken as a whole fall short of real reforms: "It is replete with directives, alterations, restructurings, subsidies, studies, reports, metrics, five-year plans, transitions, and other forms of top-down micromanagement designed to create the impression that spinning wheels represent forward movement."
Part of the case Vranich makes is that cutting under-used routes would free up resources for Amtrak to concentrate on useful routes, most notably the Northeast Corridor between Washington, D.C., and Boston.

He largely models a proposed privatization scheme on the British privatization of railroads in the 1980s.

Friday, September 15, 2006

The Traffic Problem (Again)

Carolyn Curiel wrote an interesting op-ed—"Hey! Hey! I’m Walking Here! — How New York (and Other Big Cities) Should Solve the Traffic Problem"—in The New York Times about the crippling effects of traffic in New York City and the metropolitan area.

Key problems mentioned in the article are:
  • trucks in Queens
  • gridlock in Manhattan, The Bronx, and Staten Island
  • low-income people frequently have the longest commutes, often by car
Curiel mentions tolling bridges and congestion charges as ways out of the mess.

Sadly, many of the problems won't be solved this way. Much of the traffic comes from the suburbs. While much of the region is served by local bus service and commuter rail service, an interesting oversight in planning is how to best expand and utilize mass transit.

There are two separate solutions, and ideally both need to be implemented.

PATH Extensions
The first solution requires cooperation with suburban counties. While expensive, this solution might really be the expansion of the PATH trains to other points in the region. Among densely-populated places lacking heavy rail mass transit:
  • The borough of Staten Island
  • Bergen County, New Jersey
  • Paterson, New Jersey
  • Yonkers, New York (so immediately north of The Bronx that it's often confused as part of the city)
  • New Rochelle, New York
  • Long Island
These are all densely populated centers nearly or completely devoid of regular, speedy mass transit service. Southern Westchester has suburban commuter lines, as does much of New Jersey and Long Island.

Nobody wants to build mass transit anymore, but it's clearly the best solution. The region along the Hudson River in New Jersey has become densely populated enough that it would be ideal for an underground PATH four-track line mirroring the subway trunk lines in Manhattan. With two new cross-river tunnels built, one to Midtown and one to The Bronx, that region of New Jersey could potentially see immense growth.

A four-track tunnel under the Hudson River to The Bronx from somewhere north of Fort Lee, New Jersey, where population density decreases, could allow the trunk line to continue to Stewart Airport, which admittedly requires yet another crossing in the Hudson Valley. This has the benefit, however, of adding new mass transit options to Yonkers and other parts of the the Hudson Valley where none exist. Such options could be a boon to towns like Beacon and Newburgh. Keeping the service as a four-track trunk line allows for complementary local and express service between Manhattan and the distant airport, while benefitting many communities inbetween. The trunk line could be fed by the following interstate feeder services:
  1. a two-track spur from Fort Lee to Paterson via local communities in New Jersey. This would provide direct access to Midtown Manhattan from these communties.
  2. a two-track spur south from Jersey City to Staten Island via Bayonne. This would complement present PATH service and the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail service, as well as any planned Staten Island light rail projects.
  3. a two-track across The Bronx or Yonkers to places like Rye and New Rochelle. This would provide feeder service to the main trunk line and to the New York City Subway's present spurs in The Bronx that feed Manhattan trunk lines.
Another major component of PATH expansion would be to the three airpirts already in the region. A small expansion is all it takes to bring PATH to Newark Airport. A longer expansion to Kennedy Airport has the benefit of giving downtown Brooklyn access to the suburbs, yet is already somewhat on the table politically as a Long Island Rail Road expansion. Thirdly, there is no mass transit service except by bus to LaGuardia Airport.

Beltway Service On The Subways
The other way to improve transit in the city is entirely local, and should be the city's responsibility. The outer boroughs, except a part of Brooklyn and Queens, lack any sort of cross-town mass transit service. Most of the subways feed into Manhattan. The A Train could be expanded across The Bronx, and perhaps even under the East River to LaGuardia. Beltway service further out in Brooklyn and Queens is sorely missing.

Saturday, September 09, 2006

New York Colleges to Link Through Web Port

From The Business Council of New York State:
New York’s public and private colleges have joined together to create a Web site that will foster partnerships between business and approximately 175 of New York's higher education institutions.

The Web site will help businesses contact institutions and researchers working on specific topics.

The Web site, which is expected to go live in early 2007, will be “a fast, relevant online resource to support efforts to connect, and grow industry clusters, emerging businesses, and non-profit organizations,” according to a press release from the State University of New York (SUNY) and the Commission on Independent Colleges and Universities (CICU).
For more information, see "New York's colleges connect through 'Web portal'."

New World Trade Center Complex Plans Unveiled

See "New Ground Zero designs unveiled" from the BBC.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Albany Times Union Goes After Bruno

The Albany Times-Union ("Upstate reality," September 7, 2006) had some harsh words for New York State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno:
Last Friday, on the day Mr. Faso was again in the news for challenging Mr. Spitzer's air travel, this time for using a luxury jet owned by a gambling lobbyist, Sen. Bruno was getting most of the attention as he scolded Mr. Faso for suggesting that upstate cities are "withering on the vine" and in a "death spiral." Upstate has its problems, Mr. Bruno said during an interview on a local radio station, but "I want to hear positives; I don't want to hear negatives."

Talk about being in denial. Things are bad upstate, even if Mr. Bruno doesn't want to hear about it. How bad? Bad enough for Eliot Spitzer to have compared upstate to Appalachia earlier in the campaign, only to stand corrected -- Appalachia is doing better than upstate. And bad enough that any candidate who cares about his or her credibility will acknowledge these grim facts.

Mr. Faso has his own problems, to be sure. More recently, he was attacked for using a contributor's aircraft, even as he deplored Mr. Spitzer's air travel. But that aside, Mr. Faso clearly wants to take the gloves off and go after his opponent. If only Sen. Bruno would take off his rose-colored glasses -- and leave them off.
It's hard to disagree with assessment. It's hard to find an Upstate city that has done even modestly well over the past half century. Utica has lost more than 40% of its population since 1940 (see the population chart on WikiPedia, or confirm the figures for yourself on this site from the Census Bureau). Similar stories can be told of the other formerly large cities of the region: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and even humble Albany (which once had a population well in excess of 100,000). Even more indicative of decline, the suburbs of those cities are hardly booming, even if some modest growth has at times occurred.

This was once the region with arguably the most successful, advanced economy the world had even known. The Times-Union is right: something is seriously wrong, and Bruno probably doesn't even understand what.

The Links:

NY Times: Liquor-License Freeze Enacted in N.Y.

According to The New York Times ("Liquor-License Freeze Enacted in N.Y.," September 7, 2006):

The state liquor board yesterday imposed an immediate four-month freeze on approving liquor licenses for areas of New York City that already have three or more license holders within 500 feet of each other.

The unanimous action by the New York State Liquor Authority, which was immediately denounced by a trade group of city nightclubs, follows the deaths this year of two young women. They were killed after drinking heavily at nightspots in SoHo and Chelsea.

This, of course, serves no useful public purpose whatsoever, and in the end hurts what may actually be one of the city's fastest growing economic sectors.

Nevermind that it hurts entrepreneurial individuals as well:

Robert Bookman, a lawyer for the New York Nightlife Association, a trade group of 125 bars and nightclubs, mainly in Manhattan, said the action was unfair. It has “thrown the industry into chaos within the last few hours,” he said.

Mr. Bookman added, “If I have my lifetime savings wrapped up in a place that I’m prepared to open Oct. 1 and now I can’t get a license until January, how am I going to pay $30,000 in monthly rent and not be able to open?”

The New York Times points out that there have been a few shocking murders in Manhattan in the past few months after young women left bars or clubs and got attacked by bouncers. The city, of course, enacted legislation to deal with that problem:
Last month, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg signed legislation that made it easier for the city to shut down establishments that fail to conduct background checks of security workers.
Come to think about it, that sounds like the solution: legislation that attacks the problem.

Imette St. Guillen, killed in February, and Jennifer Moore, who was 18 when she was killed in July, were not killed because liquor licenses were being issued to clubs within 500 feet of each other.

More information: "Liquor Licenses"

Sunday, September 03, 2006